Chaitanya Pride

1. Project at a glance

Project identity

Land and geographic identity

Development identity

Offering and status

Registration validity, the project completion dates and occupancy-certificate status are separate matters; the available certificate does not establish an extension or an issued OC.

2. The project story

CHAITANYA PRIDE is a residential apartment development on Plot Nos. 32 and 33 in Madeenaguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, covering Survey Nos. 38, 39 and 42. The RERA record identifies one building on a 735.67 sq. m site, with a sanctioned arrangement of one stilt level and five upper floors and 20 apartments RERA record.

The RERA unit schedule comprises ten 2BHK and ten 3BHK apartments. The portal-derived inventory lists all 20 as available and none as booked, but the supplied record does not state when that inventory snapshot was taken RERA unit table. A third-party listing describes the project as under construction; no independently verified construction-progress report or current site inspection is supplied Promoter website.

The permit and RERA record do not include an occupancy certificate. GHMC’s permit makes occupancy conditional on obtaining an OC, so the supplied evidence supports describing the building as not shown to be occupancy-certified, rather than as complete or ready for occupation.

3. Master plan, architecture & building design

• The GHMC-filed plan is for a single residential apartment building on a 735.67 sq. m plot, with 20 dwelling units and a configuration of stilt plus five upper floors. It records 2,074.15 sq. m as net residential built-up area and total proposed built-up area excluding parking; the figure including parking is 2,488.95 sq. m. These are plan-labelled measures and should not be treated as carpet or saleable area.
• The building-permit parameters state a 14.99 m building height and identify the stilt area as 401.21 sq. m. The supplied drawings identify typical floor plans and a second-floor plan, but the available extracted information does not establish a full floor-by-floor apartment count, lift or stair specifications, building footprint arrangement, or detailed circulation design.
• The plan records a 320.84 sq. m vacant plot area and 414.83 sq. m proposed coverage area, labelled as 56.39%. It also specifies a 1.00 m-wide green belt and a tot-lot, with tree planting and greenery requirements in the permit conditions. The supplied plan lists road widths of 12.00 m and 18 m; the precise relationship of each road width to the site frontage is not established in the extracted material.
• The permit and plan record 216.00 sq. m as mortgage area, with the permit identifying the second floor as handed over for mortgage. The plan states that the mortgaged built-up area may be registered only after an OC is produced.

4. Homes, configurations & floor plans

RERA records 20 apartments: ten 2BHK and ten 3BHK. The supplied portal-derived inventory shows no bookings and all units available, without an as-of date RERA unit table.

The carpet-area figures are software measurements from the GHMC-filed floor-plan drawings, not RERA-filed carpet-area disclosures, and are noted as needing review RERA unit details Floor plans. RERA saleable area is reported separately in the filing and must not be read as carpet area. The software-measured floor-plan data identifies a 1.00 m-wide balcony in one 2BHK plan; balcony area is excluded from the measured carpet area RERA unit details.

The supplied drawing extraction shows room labels including kitchen, living/dining, bedrooms, toilets and wash areas. It does not provide enough verified detail here to describe every unit layout or room dimension as a typical layout for all apartments RERA unit details.

5. Parking & vehicle circulation

The GHMC permit parameters record 414.8 sq. m total parking area, and the plan records 401.21 sq. m stilt area. The plan’s sanctioned parameters also state “PROPOSED NUMBER OF PARKINGS 0”; therefore, the supplied documents establish a parking-area figure but do not establish the number of parking spaces.

The plan conditions state that the cellar and stilt areas approved for parking are to be used exclusively for vehicle parking and not partitioned, shuttered, converted or misused. The supplied evidence does not establish visitor or accessible parking, two-wheeler counts, parking allocation by apartment, mechanical parking, EV charging, ramp arrangements, or a verified spaces-per-home ratio. A drawn parking area does not by itself establish an exclusive parking right for a particular apartment.

6. Amenities, recreation & open spaces

The GHMC-filed plan lists a tot-lot, green strip, rainwater-harvesting structures, transformer space, garbage house, sump, septic tank, dust bin, bore, storm-water line, water-supply line and sewerage line. These are plan or permit provisions, not evidence that the facilities are complete or operational.

Third-party listings mention a landscaped garden, covered car parking, lift, CCTV and other features; these are marketing-source claims, not established here as completed or GHMC-sanctioned amenities Promoter website.

7. Utilities, building services & safety

• The GHMC-filed plan identifies a sump, septic tank, bore, water-supply line, sewerage line and storm-water line; it also requires a rainwater-harvesting structure. The permit records eight rainwater-harvesting pits. The supplied evidence does not establish the water source’s capacity, storage volume, treatment arrangements, sewage-treatment plant, reuse system, or completion status.
• The plan requires space for a transformer and a garbage house within the premises. The RERA amenity record marks an electrical meter room/sub-station/receiving station as available “YES,” but records 0% progress; it does not establish an installed or operational substation RERA amenities.
• The permit makes structural safety, means-of-escape safety and fire-fighting installations the responsibility of the owner, builder/developer and technical personnel, and requires an Occupancy Fire NOC before issue of the OC. No Fire NOC or occupancy certificate is supplied. The available evidence does not specify lift count or capacity, backup power, CCTV installation status, access-control arrangements, or accessibility features.

8. Location, access & connectivity

The registered location is Madeenaguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana, PIN 500049; the project is identified on Plots 32 and 33 in Survey Nos. 38, 39 and 42 RERA record. The GHMC-filed plan identifies 12.00 m roads and an 18 m road in its plan/permit information.

A supplied location record gives HITEC City at 6.2 km Location record. The project evidence does not provide verified public-transport routes, travel times, or distances to other landmarks. A third-party listing makes general proximity claims about IT hubs, schools, colleges, hospitals, malls and a metro station; those claims are not established by the RERA-filed location data Promoter website.

9. Developer & development status

The registered promoter is SRI CHAITANYARAM BUILDERS, identified as a partnership, with GSTIN 36ADHFS3993A1ZY. Its RERA-recorded address is Plot No. 84, Venkataramana Colony, Madeenaguda, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy, Telangana, PIN 500049. G. Ramakoti Reddy is identified in the project documents as the promoter’s authorized signatory/Managing Partner Corporate record Parties record.

The project involves the landowners Mondeddu Venkata Rama Reddy and Mondeddu Aruna Kumari, and the promoter is identified in the GHMC documents as the development-agreement-cum-GPA holder Parties record.

10. Approvals, official records & documents

The evidence index above identifies supplied records and does not establish that every required approval or completion document has been obtained.