SRI RAJARAM s GRANDEUR

1. Project at a glance

Project identity

Land and geographic identity

Development identity

• Principal layout approval: Tentative Layout Plan approval 326377/LP/GP/202445/0006/2023, approved 23-01-2024 by SUDA Urban Development Authority; the record says it was delegated to Raghunadha Palem Grampanchayat. Approvals record
• Final-layout proceeding and drawing: Final layout proceeding / file 004413/GP/00016/SWFL/2025, dated 29/09/2025, issued by Raghunadha Palem Gram Panchayat; the printed Final LP No. is illegible in the extracted record. The DTCP final-layout drawing/file has the same number and date and identifies a residential layout with open plots and a final-layout pattern. Approvals record
• Approved built-up area: Not disclosed in the supplied layout records; a building-level approved built-up area is not applicable to the plotted layout as presented here. Approvals record Document index
• Buildings / floors: No residential buildings, floor configuration or building count is specified in the supplied project records. Individual dwelling construction requires separate building permission under the final-layout conditions.
• Plot count: 187 plots, as recorded in the final-layout proceeding and the layout drawing extraction. Layout record
• Parking: The final-layout drawing extraction records 0.00 sq m Common Parking Area; the final-layout proceeding lists “Common Parking Area” among its extracted utility/amenity terms but gives no parking-space count.

Offering and status

• Offered unit type: Residential plots; individual plot areas are not separately itemised in the RERA registration certificate extract. RERA record RERA filing
• Drawing-derived plot information: Software-read layout schedule: 187 plots; sizes range from 85.53 sq m to 293.96 sq m. These are drawing-derived measurements, not RERA-filed unit-type counts. Layout record
• Booked / available plots: Not disclosed in the supplied project evidence. Document index Layout record
• Development stage and occupancy / completion record: TG-RERA-filed architect’s Form 1A, dated 15/04/2026, certifies overall completion of development work. Form 1A records an occupancy certificate issued by DTCP under 004413/GP/00016/SWFL/2025, dated 29 Sep 2025, for an open layout. A final-layout proceeding is recorded as approved 29/09/2025. This is a professional certificate on file, not independent site verification.
• Completion date declared at registration: Promoter’s Form B undertakes completion by 23/01/2026.

2. The project story

SRI RAJARAM s GRANDEUR is registered as a plotted residential development in Raghunadha Palem village, Raghunadhapalem Mandal, Khammam District. The RERA-filed land description covers the ten survey subdivisions listed above, and the filed layout records describe a 187-plot scheme with internal roads, open space, utilities and social-infrastructure land. The layout conditions describe the intended use as detached single-family dwellings on individual sites; construction of homes is subject to separate building permission. RERA record Land records

The project’s initial layout approval is recorded as tentative, dated 23-01-2024. A final-layout proceeding is subsequently recorded as dated 29/09/2025. The promoter declared a 23/01/2026 completion deadline in Form B; the architect’s Form 1A, dated 15/04/2026, certifies completion of the layout development work and records an occupancy certificate for the open layout. These are filed documentary statements, not an independent inspection of site conditions.

3. Master plan, architecture & building design

This is a plotted layout rather than a multi-storey building project. The final-layout drawing records 64,750.56 sq m total layout area and 63,090.67 sq m net layout area. Its extracted land-use schedule records 34,321.87 sq m plotted area (54.40%), 20,043.32 sq m road area (31.77%), 5,724.56 sq m open space (9.07%), 724.94 sq m buffer area (1.15%), 1,629.76 sq m social infrastructure area (2.58%), and 646.22 sq m utility area (1.02%). The drawing also records 0.00 sq m common parking area and 0.00 sq m green belt area.

The final-layout drawing identifies road widths including 9.14m, 12.19m, 9.28m and 18.29m Main Internal Approach Road; it also labels a 9.14m Wide Main Road. The drawing-derived layout record states 187 plots and gives the plot schedule as complete. Plot-size bands and land-use detail are set out under “Homes, configurations & floor plans.” Layout record

No apartment or villa building count, building footprint, floor levels, lifts, stairs or building-specific phase arrangement is disclosed in the supplied records. The final-layout proceeding states that building permission for individual sites is to be considered separately.

4. Homes, configurations & floor plans

The offering described in the project records is residential plots, not apartments or villas. The approved-layout drawing’s plot schedule was software-read and records 187 plots, with measured areas from 85.53 sq m (102.3 sq yd) to 293.96 sq m (351.6 sq yd); the median measured plot area is 178.85 sq m (213.9 sq yd). These are drawing-derived measurements and should be checked against the drawing. Layout record

The drawing-derived land-use split is: Plots 34,220.44 sq m (54.2%); Roads 20,151.24 sq m (31.9%); Parks / open space 5,720.05 sq m (9.1%); Utilities 644.21 sq m (1.0%); Social infrastructure 1,629.76 sq m (2.6%); Amenities 0.0 sq m (0.0%). Percentages are computed in the supplied drawing-derived record from its stated net layout area. Layout record

No booked/available plot counts, unit-wise allocations, apartment carpet areas, or saleable-area schedule is supplied. The available floor-plan input comprises four layout sheets and no flat floor plans; no software-measured carpet areas are available. Floor plans Document index

5. Parking & vehicle circulation

The final-layout drawing extraction records 0.00 sq m Common Parking Area and supplies no count of parking spaces, visitor spaces, accessible spaces or EV-charging points. The final-layout proceeding’s extracted terms mention “Common Parking Area,” but do not quantify it. No plot-specific parking allocation is documented in the supplied evidence.

The layout drawing records internal road widths including 9.14m, 12.19m, 9.28m and 18.29m Main Internal Approach Road. The layout conditions state that internal roads are to remain open for access to neighbouring lands. These records do not establish a separate pedestrian route or a traffic-management arrangement.

6. Amenities, recreation & open spaces

The tentative-approval extraction describes the applicant’s obligation to develop infrastructure and amenities and to hand over specified roads, open space, social infrastructure and utilities. The final-layout proceeding also records reserved open space and social-infrastructure land.

7. Utilities, building services & safety

8. Location, access & connectivity

The registered location is Raghunadha Palem, Raghunadhapalem Mandal, Khammam District, Telangana 507002. The supplied geocode is a cadastral parcel centroid at 17.289694499936026, 80.19631528866137. RERA record Location record

The registered land boundaries identify proposed roads to the east and north and other land to the west and south. The approved-layout drawing lists internal road widths of 9.14m, 12.19m, 9.28m and 18.29m Main Internal Approach Road. The nearest sampled Outer Ring Road interchange is recorded at approximately 161.9 km; no public-transport details or other measured landmark distances are supplied. RERA filing Location record

9. Developer & development status

The registered promoter is SRI RAJARAM CONSTRUCTIONS LLP, an LLP, with GSTIN 36AFGFS6804P1ZC. Its address on the supplied record is TULASI HOMES, AMARAVATI NAGAR, RAGHUNADHAPALEM, Raghunadhapalem, Khammam, 507002. KONERU SIRISHA is recorded as an authorised signatory. No official website or contact number is supplied. Corporate record Parties record RERA filing

See the completion date and development-stage records under “Offering and status” above.

10. Approvals, official records & documents

The supplied approval extracts state that the tentative-layout approval is not proof of land title and that individual residential building permissions are to be considered separately.