Shaantham Meadows

1. Project at a glance

Project identity

Land and geographic identity

Development identity

Offering and status

2. The project story

• SHAANTHAM MEADOWS is presented in the TG-RERA file as a plotted residential layout on land identified as 211/P, 212/P, 214/P, 217, 281/P, 282/P and 283 at Ramanthapur. The layout record describes 545 plots, internal roads and open space, with additional reserved areas for a primary school, nursery school and convenient shops.
• The approval material identifies a Draft Technical Layout Pattern and says final layout release follows development works and other stated requirements. A later Gram Panchayat record includes a work-completion certificate, and the architect’s Form 1A reports the layout completed and an occupancy certificate issued by DTCP. These filed documents describe project completion; they do not constitute an independent physical inspection in this review.

3. Master plan, architecture & building design

• The project is organised as a plotted layout, not a tower or apartment development. The layout document records 545 plots over Ac.45-32 Guntas / Ac.45.80 Cents; 221672.00 Sq. Yds. and identifies these land-use components: plotted area Ac. 26.916 Cents; 130273.44 Sq. Yds. (58.77%), roads Ac. 14.304 Cents; 69231.36 Sq. Yds. (31.23%), and open space Ac. 4.58 Cents; 22167.20 Sq. Yds. (10.00%). It also identifies land reserved for a primary school, nursery school and convenient shops.
• The layout drawing lists road widths of 33'-0", 40'-0" and 60'-0". The layout conditions call for road formation, drains, storm-water channelisation, greenery and rainwater-harvesting pits. These are requirements or provisions recorded in the layout documents, not confirmation that each item has been completed. No building footprint, floor configuration, tower height, lift/stair arrangement, plot-by-plot schedule, or phase organisation is provided in the supplied drawing extractions.

4. Homes, configurations & floor plans

The offering evidenced in the RERA-filed materials is residential plots. The supplied file includes a blank provisional allotment-letter template and a partially filled agreement-for-sale template, but no completed buyer allotments, RERA inventory schedule or plot-wise booked/available figures.

No software-measured plot or floor-plan areas are available: the drawing review records three drawings, with 0 measured, 3 scans pending, and no flat-containing drawings. The layout’s plot and land-use figures are layout-level figures, not plot-specific saleable areas. Floor plans

5. Parking & vehicle circulation

No parking-space count, visitor or accessible parking provision, parking allocation schedule, or vehicle-parking layout is disclosed in the supplied records. The layout drawing identifies internal roads of 33'-0", 40'-0" and 60'-0"; the approval conditions require roads to be opened for access to neighbouring sites and prohibit a compound wall or fencing around the site. These are layout-road and condition details, not evidence of a completed circulation system or exclusive parking rights.

6. Amenities, recreation & open spaces

No clubhouse or indoor recreation facility is identified in the supplied layout approval record. The project’s amenity checklist marks internal roads and footpaths, water supply, green strip/park, water conservation/rainwater harvesting and recreational open space as “YES,” with progress fields at 0; the checklist therefore records provision/availability fields but does not establish completion. RERA amenities

7. Utilities, building services & safety

The layout conditions require street lighting and electricity facilities, a sewerage-disposal system, protected water supply, drains and storm-water channelisation, and rainwater-harvesting pits. The RERA amenity checklist also lists water supply, sewerage, storm-water drains, treatment and disposal of sewage and sullage, solid-waste management, energy management, fire protection, and an electrical meter room/sub-station/receiving station; the supplied checklist does not provide capacities or establish that these systems are completed. RERA amenities

No project-specific water source or storage capacity, treatment-plant capacity, electrical load or backup capacity, fire-system specification, security/CCTV system, accessible circulation design, or independently verified utility-completion record is supplied. The later layout document’s extracted completion record and architect’s certificate state overall work/project completion, but do not provide system-by-system test results or capacities.

8. Location, access & connectivity

The registered project location is Ramanthapur, Yeldurthy Mandal, Medak District, Telangana, PIN 502255; the layout documents identify Ramanthapur Gram Panchayat and Masaipet Mandal. RERA record RERA filing

The layout drawing refers to NH 7 as “EXISTING 200'-0" NH 7 TO BE WIDENED TO 250'-0".” The supplied location data gives the nearest sampled Outer Ring Road interchange as approximately 12.4 km from the cadastral parcel centroid. No approach-road condition, public-transport service, or additional verified landmark-distance information is supplied. Location record

9. Developer & development status

The registered promoter is ITHIKA PROPERTIES, identified in the filing as a Partnership. The supplied corporate identifier is GSTIN 36AAIFI7109Q1ZS. The project record lists B, Nagendra Nagar, Ramanthapur, Yeldurthy, Medak, 502255 as the promoter address and names CHINTAKUNTA PRAMODE KUMAR as authorised signatory. Corporate record Parties record RERA filing

Form B, dated 28/10/2022, is a promoter declaration that the project would be completed by 30/07/2024 and that the land was free from encumbrances. The later completion records state that development works were completed and the architect’s Form 1A reports overall project completion and an occupancy certificate issued by DTCP. Those are promoter-filed or professional certificate statements; this review has no independent site verification.

10. Approvals, official records & documents

The supplied review includes the above extracted documents, but not a complete set of original drawing sheets or system-by-system completion records. The RERA-filed layout document states that its draft permission is not proof of land title.